Airbus bribery: All fingers point to Mahama – NPP


The governing New Patriotic Party (NPP) has called on former President John Mahama to respond to allegations that an individual close to a top government official was bribed by Airbus between 2009-2015 in the now famous airbus military aircraft scandal.

Speaking at a news conference in Accra, on Monday, 3 Faebruary 2020 Communication Director of the NPP, Yaw Buabeng Asamoah, asked the former president to officially respond to the court documents. 

“In the face of these facts, it is very necessary for president Mahama to come out and be heard publicly,” Mr Buabeng Asamoah said.

“He cannot continue to hide behind his party members including a former attorney general. Of course, we are all aware that he hates answering questions on corruption but the answer he must because at this moment all fingers point to him and one of his brothers.”

Meanwhile, the NDC has denied reports that Airbus paid bribes to some government officials during the administration of the late Prof. John Evans Atta-Mills and John Mahama.

The party in a statement signed by former Attorney General & Minister for Justice, Marietta Brew Appiah-Opong argued that media reports on the issue did not capture the true reflection of the approved judgement of the case in the UK.

The NDC statement said: “Our attention has been drawn to media reports about a Deferred Prosecution Agreement (DPA) entered between Airbus SE and the United Kingdom Serious Fraud Office in respect of the practice of Airbus SE in paying commission to its agents and the use of those commissions.

“The reports alleging that Airbus SE paid bribes during the administration of President John Evans Atta Mills and John Dramani Mahama are false, misleading and do not reflect the Approved Judgment. Indeed, the Approved Judgment of the Crown Court of Southwark approving the DPA between Airbus and the UK Serious Fraud Office does not allege that any payment was made by Airbus to any Ghanaian Government official.

“It is therefore a gross distortion for the media to conclude that officials of the Ghana Government between 2009 and 2015 were bribed or paid any commissions by Airbus for the acquisition of the Casa C-295 aircrafts.”

A  judgment from the Crown Court at Southwark, UK, said: “The fifth count alleges  that contrary  to section 7  of  the  Bribery  Act  2010, between  1  July  2011  and  1  June  2015,  Airbus  SE  failed  to  prevent  persons associated with Airbus SE from bribing others concerned with the purchase of military transport aircraft by the government of Ghana, where the said  bribery was intended to obtain or retain business or advantage in the conduct of business for Airbus SE. 53.

“Between 2009 and 2015, an Airbus defence company engaged Intermediary 5, a close relative of a high-ranking elected Ghanaian government official (Government Official 1) as its BP in respect of the proposed sale of three military transport aircraft to the government of Ghana.

“A number of Airbus employees knew that Intermediary 5 was a close relative of Government Official 1, who was a key decision-maker in respect of the proposed sales. A number of Airbus employees made or promised success-based commission payments of approximately €5 million to Intermediary 5.

“False documentation was created by or with the agreement of Airbus employees in order to support and disguise these payments. The payments were intended to induce or reward ‘improper favour’ by Government Official 1 toward Airbus. Payments were eventually stopped due to the arrangement failing the due diligence processes required by the Liquidation Committee.”

This revelation came to light as French, British and U.S. authorities have been investigating Airbus for alleged corruption over jet sales for more than a decade.

The plane-maker has agreed to pay a record $4 billion (€3.6 billion) after reaching settlements with investigators in Britain, France and the United States to end the probe that began four years ago.

Airbus, in 2016, reported itself and asked the regulators to look at documentation about its use of overseas agents.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here